By David Lony Majak.
March 7, 2015(Nyamilepedia) — The AU/UN decision on placing South Sudan under trusteeship administration is highly welcomed, and may act as the downfall of the two warring parties led by the President Savla Kiir and his former vice president Dr. Riak Machar Teny, the chairman of the moment. It is very unfortunate that, the two warring parties of the ongoing conflict in the republic of South Sudan have failed to bring peace in the country. All activists, civil society’s organizations, religious communities in South Sudan, ordinary citizens, middle class men and the global citizens have had welcomed the AU, UN, African Union and United Nations’ decision to take over the power from the two warring parties (quoted AU, Reuters’ report dated 6th, march 2015 that AU inquiry wants KIIR excluded from translational leadership). This initiative will definitely save the lives of the innocent suffering civilians in the country, Mr. President Gen: Savla Kiir and his immediate rival former vice president Dr. Riak Machar Teny and their die hearts political supporters never thought of national interest in order for them to agree on certain common issues which may brings peace back to the people of the Republic of South Sudan.
According to the AU report on 6th, March 2015, Reuters, wants AU-appointed and United Nations (UN) backed three person panels to oversee a five years translation period and the creation of a translational executive thereafter; this is very considerate decision because it will help us in restructuring the old system of governance in South Sudan, it came as a result of failure from the two leaders to bring peace to the people of South Sudan.
The African Unions and United Nations’ suggestions to rule the interim period of translational government of national unity in South Sudan shall be a road map to the permanent peace building in South Sudan and there will be a equal distribution of national resources to the needy communities, especially the affected region and its states since the ongoing war broke out in December 2013, majority of South Sudanese civilians have been affected and being displaced from their homes of origins and they are now putting up under United Nations camps within the country. I believe the two leaders heading the current instability in the country may enjoy the sequences of not valuing the lives of their innocent people as leaders.
This decision of placing South Sudan under AU African Union and UN- United Nations Trusteeship shall only benefit the groups categorized below:
- Permanent ceasefire and peace building in South Sudan
- Ordinary citizens who do not know kiir and Machar in nature
- Non-political believers shall celebrate its functionality
- The technical knowhow groups
- Civil Society’ Activists challenging poor system of governances in the country
- The freedom fighters known as journalists and writers
- Youth and upcoming generations
- The religious communities being dictated by the system
- Foreigner diplomats and their communities in the Republic of South Sudan
- Equal sharing of resources and banning off corrupt groups.
Benefits and its positive impacts on the African Union/United Nations trusteeship to rule South Sudan for a period of five (5 years) shall reform the various unsolved issues and problems developed by Savla Kiir and Riak Machar’s regime from 2005- 2013 until the war broke out in the country: The following may benefit the people of the republic of South Sudan in different capacities if implemented by the African Union and United Nations panel body for the time of trusteeship as shall be agreed later on the final documents if the two leaders failed to bring peace completely.
Politics- There shall be no political self-attachment of running the country at the time of UN, AU United Nations and African Union trusteeship period. G10 politicians will die instantly once it is implemented, cabinets of the two leaders shall improve on the services delivery to the local population if assign under AU/UN trusteeship administration.
Equal Sharing of resources– distribution of country’s resources to the needful communities, improvement of economical factors like Agriculture and business sections.
Reformation of political ideology- Political transformation from tribal ideology to national ideology, South Sudanese politicians are known to be political brokers not national leaders to govern the country in right direction.
Military wings- Military reforms with its all security organs in the country, where there shall be national trained armies instead of the current existing individual doctrines armies of Gen: Salva Kiir and his colleague Dr. Riak Machar owning armies as theirs.
Eradication of poverty and common diseases affecting civil population- Reductions of poverty and diseases in South Sudan, national budgets for such programs were embezzled during Gen: Salva Kiir and Dr. Riak Machar’s regime from 2005-2013 until the war broke out, subject to corruption act under international law and anti-corruption bodies.
Development of national infrastructures- Infrastructural programs shall also be implements for the time of UN/AU trusteeship, this will helps in building schools, roads construction and government infrastructures reforms in the country. People are still using natural means of transportation, children are learning under trees better Khartoum regime before CPA-2005.
Education and communities’ compensation- Basic services delivery to the needy population and the affected civilians in the three (3) states of greater Upper Nile Region as a result of the current war. AU/UN administration shall definitely design projects relating to the developmental issues to rebuild the destroyed areas during the war.
Training on national interest and its values– This shall be a guiding principle for the people of South Sudan to know their national interests instead to keep believing in outsiders like Mr. President Museveni of Uganda and the rest of East African con-men who claimed to be regional leaders, the so called IGAD administration.
Reconciliations and forgiveness- Re-unifications of South Sudanese ethnics groups to reconcile and to reunite themselves once again as one citizens of one nation is a very crucial issue. This means there shall be national reconciliations programs of appealing to the affected victims during the war, and may also help in building national identity for the people of South Sudan.
Freedom and justice for all kinds- Promotion of freedom of speeches, from civil societies’ groups, religious groups, journalists, ordinary citizens and the opinions writers. This will help in promotion of free speeches in the country; so many people in south Sudan are dying with positive information in their minds which may be of national constructions if given freedom of speeches.
Improvement of cheap politics in South Sudan; it shall also act as a guiding principle to the future politicians to play their balls in the scope of world standard instead of sub-standardizing their politics at the tribal sentiments, to avoid inciting greater equatoriains, people of greater upper Nile and confusing people of greater BGS as die heart supporters. This ideology will completely die under UN/AU trusteeship for the period of five (5 years).
Regime change and parliament dissolution- The death of the current cabinets, G10 and their regime is also an important role to consider since they have worked for the downfall of their people while they were only fulfilling individual’s interests as political post holders from 2005-2013. If the AU/UN trusteeship administration is given chance, there shall be a call for the new parliamentarians to be sent from their respective constituencies and the old parliament under Mr. President Kiir and Dr. Riak Machar the then will be dissolve amicably for the period of trusteeship. This will correct the immature political ideology of South Sudanese politicians to improve on their parallel politics and to value the country first.
This analysis is subject to the failure of the two leaders leading the current ongoing war in the country and that they had failed to compiles with national interest, especially the incumbent president of the republic of South Sudan and his political rival PHD holder Dr. Riak Machar the rebel chairman. I still recalled the fact that SPLM/SPLA not the two newly created SPLM/SPLA-IO and SPLM/SPLA- juba has been a bad party for the people of Southern Sudan since its formation and begun tribal sentiments and killing of its civil population in 1983, 1991 and 2013.
Take it or Leave it, the author can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org