Remarks Of the United Nations Representatives On South Sudan and Syria

By Ambassador Michele J. Sison,
U.S. Deputy Representative to the United Nations,
U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
WASHINGTON D.C., United States of America,
Members of the UN Security Council sitting around a round table.(Photo: UN)

Members of the UN Security Council sitting around a round table.(Photo: UN)

September 2, 2016(Nyamilepedia) —-  As we head into September and a new General Assembly high season, it is appropriate for us to take a moment and consider some of the Security Council’s priorities – priorities we’ve addressed during a busy month of August, and that we’ll need to continue to address moving forward.

In particular, I’d like to focus on the Council’s work on Syria and South Sudan, and to briefly touch on the DPRK and our ongoing deliberations on the selection of the next Secretary-General. Mr. President, as we have for so many months, the Council in August focused on the political, humanitarian, and security situations in Syria, as other colleagues have noted. I, too, would like to take a moment to recall the very moving Arria-formula meeting, which the UK, France, New Zealand and Ukraine hosted with us, and where we heard directly from those who witnessed the siege in Aleppo. These were individuals who had worked so hard to try to relieve some of the terrible suffering there, including medical doctors and first-responder “White Helmets.” The scenes they described and images they shared showed clearly a humanitarian catastrophe of searing scale. Cutting off food and medicine to hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians undermines the Cessation of Hostilities and plays into the hands of violent extremist groups.The next day, the Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, Stephen O’Brien, and Special Envoy Staffan de Mistura met with the Council and called for an immediate renewal of the Cessation of Hostilities and a pause to enable humanitarian access.

[ad name=”Google Ads 03″]

Incredibly, largely because of the Syrian regime’s obstruction, no interagency UN convoys were able to deliver assistance between August 1 and August 23. And between August 23 and August 29, just four UN interagency convoys delivered to besieged or hard-to-reach areas in Syria. We simply must see improvements to humanitarian access. As I said in this chamber a little more than a week ago, while the United States condemns all parties to this conflict that use siege tactics, we must be clear that the Assad regime and its international backers are responsible for the suffering of the overwhelming majority of Syrians living under siege.

This leads me to a point I’d like to make regarding the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Just yesterday we received a disturbing but important briefing from High Representative Kim Won-soo and Joint Investigative Mechanism head Virginia Gamba. We are reviewing the findings of the OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism carefully. But based on what we have heard, the case is strong and clear that a robust Council response is warranted. It is essential that we come together to ensure consequences for those who have used chemical weapons in Syria.

Mr. President, another country where the status quo is unbearable is South Sudan. This month the Security Council look important action – responding to calls from key regional partners – to create a Regional Protection Force within UNMISS. Security Council Resolution 2304 set out three priorities for the 4,000-strong Regional Protection Force: number one – facilitate safe and free movement in Juba; number two – protect key facilities; and number three – prevent attacks against civilians, the UN, and humanitarian actors. The force will have the authority to use all necessary means to carry out these responsibilities. These efforts will support UNMISS’s broader mission to protect civilians, monitor human rights, facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance, and support the implementation of the peace agreement. We look forward to the Council mission that Senegal and the United States will lead to South Sudan starting tomorrow.

Another challenge on the Council’s docket that requires resolve involves the DPRK. Again, and more than once, the Council was required to meet urgently to address a new provocation by North Korea. The DPRK’s actions, and the advancements in its ballistic missile capabilities, in particular, cannot be ignored.

Mr. President, I would also like to mention our work on the selection of the next Secretary-General. The Council held its second and third straw polls in August, and we feel that the process is moving in the right direction, but we must stay focused on our deliberations despite the busy month ahead. Even as we plan for the arrival of many of our countries’ leaders in just a few weeks, we look forward to continuing our efforts in September to identify the best qualified candidate to lead this organization into the next decade.

Finally, I’d like to thank Malaysia for its superb leadership of the Council this month – and to offer our support to New Zealand as they pick up the gavel in the busy month of September.

Thank you, Mr. President.


Distributed by APO on behalf of U.S. Department of State.

One comment

  • Deang Gatluak

    Kiir is deploying the same tactics as Habyarimana did in Rwanda prior to the genocide, except that Kiir has already performed genocide in December 2013 in Juba, then in Leer an other locations.

    Ongoing frustration of any development by UN, IGAD and AU, using vile rhetoric to confuse some and instil hatred in others. Setting the scene for a future blood bath. Luckily the international community knows this very well.

    The social contract between citizen and the state were broken the moment the first South Sudanese was killed in Juba Dec 2013. After that point, all talk about sovereignty of the state is rubbish.

    The recalcitrant Mr. Kiir confuses any suggestion to improvement to be high treason, hence the crackdown and murder on journalists. So insecure is Mr. Kiir that any public uttering of facts carries the very possible risk of one of his unknown gunmen” coming for a late night execution visit. But his antics are well known. The ridiculous attempts to appear “presidential” were silly at the beginning and now, plain entertainment. Self-deluded statements and incoherent ramblings prove the point that there is no intellect available to turn the failed state around.

    Intellectuals who have skills and knowledge, have abandoned their responsibility (and there is understanding for this in the climate of extermination) to join the sycophants.

    The way forward for South Sudan requires new thinking, and this is something that the Juba Mob again and again has proven incapable of.

    Kiir and his administration is like a severe constipation, the pill to remedy the disease is there. But when it all gets flushed out, it will not be pretty, but later on when the stench is gone, a chance for a new beginning

Tell us what you think

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.